HomeSportsTennisIga Swiatek's value soars to £390m and net worth leaves Emma Raducanu...

Iga Swiatek’s value soars to £390m and net worth leaves Emma Raducanu in dust

Iga Swiatek reportedly has a brand value of £390million after winning four French Open titles and the 2022 US Open. And she is also said to be £6.5m richer than Emma Raducanu after amassing a net worth of £17.5m.

Swiatek is one of the best tennis players on the planet and dominated the French Open between 2022 and 2024 as she won three consecutive titles following her maiden triumph in Paris in 2020. The 24-year-old has already reached two Grand Slam semi-finals this year but couldn’t retain her Roland Garros trophy as she was dumped out by Aryna Sabalenka on the clay.

Swiatek has seen her brand value increase by a staggering 452 per cent in the last five years, due to her endorsements, earnings and rise to fame and once again tops the list of the most valuable women’s personal brands in Poland for 2025.

The list was compiled by Forbes Women Poland in association with the Institute of Media Monitoring and has revealed that she also earned almost £27m in prize money and a further £11m through business deals.

Second on the brand value rich list is personal trainer and entrepreneur Anna Lewandowska (£58m), who is married to Barcelona footballer Robert Lewandowski, with tennis star Magda Linette (£57m) following closely behind in third.

Raducanu, meanwhile, has been earning plenty of cash since lifting the US Open trophy as an 18-year-old in 2021 courtesy of prize money and endorsements.

The talented star is one of the biggest names in British sport and has worked with the likes of Dior, Evian, HSBC and Vodafone.

According to Celebrity Net Worth, the 22-year-old has a net worth of £11m. And she could grow that figure significantly in the years to come thanks to her enormous profile on and off the court.

Earlier this month, Raducanu was asked about equal prize money for men and women ahead of Queen’s.

And she insisted money isn’t her motivation for playing tennis as she explained: “There is obviously a big difference [in prize money] and I’m sure a lot players will kind of say their piece on it, but I just prefer not to get involved and just whatever the situation is I’ll kind of roll with it, but I’m never really going to take a stand either way.

“I don’t really get involved or kind of stay in the loop with all the boards and all the decisions and stuff. I kind of just get on with it and I don’t feel like I really am playing for money.

“Of course I need to sustain my team which is extremely expensive and you know… with my kind of profile, coaches and team members kind of see that. So it is a very expensive sport, but it’s not my main motivator of why I play.”

Content Source: www.express.co.uk

Related News

Latest News