Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

HomeEuropePierre Boulez at 100: What Is His Legacy Today?

Pierre Boulez at 100: What Is His Legacy Today?

He was often provocative and absolute, only to change his mind and contradict himself with equal conviction. Laurent Bayle, who succeeded Boulez at IRCAM and Cité de la Musique, and recently published the book “Pierre Boulez, Aujourd’hui” (“Pierre Boulez Today”), said, “There is no ideologue in music like him.”

Because Boulez was so powerful, his severity could be poison for any artist who didn’t adhere to his worldview. He disdained vast swaths of repertoire, to the point where he could seem stubbornly incurious, as in his lack of interest in works by Philip Glass and John Adams. Salonen recalled watching Boulez virtually end the career of a composer after hearing his work, but he also said he was attracted, like many of his modernist peers, to the “concept of right and wrong” that Boulez offered.

“It was an ethics of contemporary music,” Salonen said. “Young people want to know the right thing to do, and Boulez was like a moral beacon. He could make you feel like you belonged, like you were one of the good guys.”

Perhaps surprisingly, Boulez is often remembered as a warm, wickedly funny presence. Despite his stature, he wasn’t a haughty maestro. The French critic Christian Merlin, in his excellent but untranslated biography “Pierre Boulez,” describes tours in which he rode in coach with musicians rather than business class, and stayed in the same hotels.

And there was a generosity in his last act, as the founder and leader of the academy at the Lucerne Festival in Switzerland, at Haefliger’s invitation. Not long after taking over the festival, Haefliger called Boulez, who “knew exactly what he wanted to do,” he recalled. “And I appreciate that this was it, rather than creating polished symphonies or looking for immediate success.”

BOULEZ WROTE RELATIVELY LITTLE music. In Deutsche Grammophon’s set, his catalog takes up only 11 discs. Salonen said that “we’re too close still” to know what among his works will remain in the repertoire, but some are candidates for classics. And the masterpieces came early. Merlin wrote that with the monumentality of the Second Piano Sonata, “the young Boulez didn’t hesitate to assume the legacy of Beethoven: At 22 years old, he wrote his ‘Hammerklavier.’”

Content Source: www.nytimes.com

Related News

Latest News