Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

HomeUSJustice Dept. Investigates Minnesota Prosecutor Office Over Race Policy

Justice Dept. Investigates Minnesota Prosecutor Office Over Race Policy

The head of the Justice Department’s civil rights division said on Saturday that she was investigating a new policy in Minnesota’s largest county to determine whether it illegally considers race as a factor in plea deals.

Harmeet K. Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for civil rights, announced the investigation on social media Saturday night. A letter to the county attorney’s office in Hennepin County, which include Minneapolis, will seek to determine if it engages “in the illegal consideration of race in its prosecutorial decision-making.”

The inquiry stems from a policy memo the office issued days earlier, in which prosecutors were told to be aware of racial or age considerations in plea negotiations and sentencing.

“While racial identity and age are not appropriate grounds for departures, proposed resolutions should consider the person charged as a whole person, including their racial identity and age,” the memo said. “While these factors should not be controlling, they should be part of the overall analysis. Racial disparities harm our community, lead to distrust, and have a negative impact on community safety. Prosecutors should be identifying and addressing racial disparities at decision points, as appropriate.”

Advocates for sentencing reform have long argued that the criminal justice system produces significant disparities in the prison sentences given to Black defendants versus white defendants convicted of the same crimes, and the prosecutor’s memo seems designed to address that concern.

Ms. Dhillon’s letter said the federal investigation would seek to determine if the local prosecutors have created “a pattern or practice of depriving persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.”

Daniel Borgertpoepping, a spokesman for the county prosecutor’s office, said the office had not received the Justice Department letter but was aware of Ms. Dhillon’s social media post.

“Our office will cooperate with any resulting investigation and we’re fully confident our policy complies with the law,” he said.

The investigation comes at tumultuous time for the civil rights division. Hundreds of lawyers and staff members have resigned in recent weeks, amid rising frustration with the reassignment or departure of most of the managers who work there, and demands for new types of investigations that have alarmed current and former lawyers at the division.

Ms. Dhillon has spoken favorably of the mass exodus, and suggested that those leaving are more supportive of “woke ideology” than President Trump’s agenda.

Content Source: www.nytimes.com

Related News

Latest News