Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

HomeBusinessEx-Barclays boss Staley fights for reputation over Jeffrey Epstein links

Ex-Barclays boss Staley fights for reputation over Jeffrey Epstein links

Former Barclays boss Jes Staley has begun a legal bid to overturn a ban from the UK’s financial services industry, related to his links to the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) proposed the leadership ban in 2023, alongside a £1.8m fine, finding that Mr Staley had made misleading statements about his relationship with Epstein in correspondence with the watchdog.

Mr Staley’s barrister told the Upper Tribunal in a written statement that Mr Staley, who had quit his job at Barclays in 2021 to contest the FCA’s findings, admits a “close professional relationship” with Epstein but denies they were friends.

Money latest: Don’t fall for this ‘Apple charger’ trick

Their association dates back to a time when Epstein was a client of JPMorgan Chase’s private bank, which Mr Staley headed before taking the role at Barclays in 2015.

The FCA’s ruling related to the contents of a letter sent by the then Barclays chairman in 2019, but reviewed by Mr Staley, which summarised the depth of the two men’s ties in response to a request for “assurance” from the regulator.

The watchdog determined it contained two misleading statements over their relationship, namely over how close they were and that Mr Staley’s last contact with Epstein was “well before he joined Barclays in 2015”.

The FCA further found that they maintained contact through Mr Staley’s daughter up to at least February 2017.

Its barrister, Leigh-Ann Mulcahy KC, said in her written opening submission that he acted “recklessly and without integrity” by allowing the letter to be sent with the misleading statements.

“Mr Staley has consistently mis-stated the nature of his relationship with Mr Epstein, in particular downplaying the
closeness and extent of their connection, and the time they ceased contact,” she added.

Image:
Jeffrey Epstein was found to have killed himself in jail in 2021. Pic: US Department of Justice

The FCA’s case includes more than 1,000 emails between the pair, some provided by JPMorgan and
others from Epstein’s estate, in which Staley was said to have described their friendship as “profound” and referred to Epstein as “family”.

“While the origin of the relationship was professional, it evolved into a personal relationship,” the barrister said.

Epstein killed himself in a New York jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.

In addition to his proposed FCA fine, Mr Staley missed out on pay and bonus awards above £18m after he left Barclays under a cloud.

Mr Staley’s barrister, Robert Smith KC, argued the letter sent by Barclays chair Nigel Higgins to the FCA was “intended to achieve only one purpose, which was to inform the (FCA) that neither Mr Staley nor Barclays had had any
knowledge of or involvement in Mr Epstein’s unlawful conduct”.

He added that the letter was not meant to give a full account of their interactions.

Mr Staley is expected to give evidence to the hearing in London next week.

The Upper Tribunal is also expected to hear from Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey, who was in charge of the FCA between 2016 and 2020.

Content Source: news.sky.com

Related News

Latest News