Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

HomeBusinessWill Big Donors Follow Haley Back to Trump?

Will Big Donors Follow Haley Back to Trump?

Harvard’s governing body won’t let 13 pro-Palestinian student protesters graduate. The Harvard Corporation rejected a bid by faculty to award degrees to the students, who face disciplinary action for participating in a protest encampment. In related news, the hedge fund mogul Ken Griffin, an alumnus who paused his financial support for the school over its handling of antisemitism on campus, urged graduates to “constructively debate ideas even in moments of heated disagreement.”

The Justice Department and several states plan to sue Live Nation Entertainment, the parent company of Ticketmaster, as soon as Thursday, The Times reports. The antitrust investigation has taken more than a year — and follows an even longer period of frustration at the company’s dominance of live event ticketing.

Here’s what the case is likely to focus on, according to The Times:

The government plans to argue in a lawsuit that Live Nation shored up its power through Ticketmaster’s exclusive ticketing contracts with concert venues, as well as the company’s dominance over concert tours and other businesses like venue management, said two of the people, who declined to be named because the lawsuit was still private. That helped the company maintain a monopoly, raising prices and fees for consumers, limiting innovation in the ticket industry and hurting competition, the people said.

The government will argue that tours promoted by the company were more likely to play venues where Ticketmaster was the exclusive ticket service, one of the people said, and that Live Nation’s artists played venues that it owns.

Bloomberg News, which first reported the lawsuit’s timing, added that the Justice Department may seek to break up the company, which was formed by the 2010 union of Live Nation and Ticketmaster.

Live Nation has sought to head off such a lawsuit for some time, denying that it sets high prices and fees and arguing that it faces increased competition. Last year, it agreed to be more transparent about the fees that are added to ticket sales, signing onto the Biden administration’s fight against so-called junk fees.

Last month, Live Nation co-hosted a party in Washington ahead of the annual White House Correspondents’ Association dinner to press its case. Attendees took in a performance by the country singer Jelly Roll — and were greeted by cocktail napkins promoting positive facts about the company’s impact on the economy.

Content Source: www.nytimes.com

Related News

Latest News