Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

HomeUSWhat Starship failure means for Elon Musk's Mars plans

What Starship failure means for Elon Musk’s Mars plans

Elon Musk’s plans to go to Mars may not have come crashing down to Earth but they’ve certainly suffered a significant setback.

The ninth test flight of Starship, the SpaceX spacecraft specifically designed to make “humans an interplanetary species”, ended with it spinning out of control over the Indian Ocean.

This was Starship’s third consecutive failure.

The machine that was touted as taking humans as far as Mars as soon as 2028 has yet to make an orbit of Earth.

Musk‘s near-term Mars plans look even more like science fiction.

No surprise then that a much-trailed update from Musk laying out the detail of his Mars programme scheduled to coincide with the test flight was cancelled.

Image:
File pic: Reuters

He posted shortly after the test, as he typically does, about how much had been learned from the test flight and how the programme would ramp up from now on.

Musk’s “fail fast” approach to rocket development has been central to SpaceX becoming, by a large margin, the most successful space launch business in history.

Whether it’s electric cars or rockets, Musk has a reputation for over-promising on timings but ultimately delivering era-defining technology.

But is this an early sign that when it comes to Starship, he has finally reached too far?

The launch initially went as planned - but unravelled about 30 minutes in. Pic: Reuters
Image:
The launch initially went as planned – but unravelled. Pic: Reuters

As well as trying to overcome two spectacular failures of Starship in tests earlier this year, it was the first attempt to fly a reused Super Heavy booster. Recycling rockets is what has allowed SpaceX to dominate the launch business with its Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy machines.

It’s also essential for the commercial viability of the Starship system.

The reconditioned booster performed almost perfectly, in that it delivered Starship to space. But it exploded while conducting its “landing burn” – not the outcome engineers trying to demonstrate reusability would have wanted.

Read more tech news:
‘I’ve been turned into an AI train announcer’
How long before the UK is launching rockets?
Mum allowed to sue chatbot firm

Aside from helping Donald Trump deliver on a promise to put Americans on Mars during his presidency, Musk’s plans for Mars are largely a personal project.

But this latest failure may have a wider impact on Musk’s fortunes.

Investors were left panicking after Musk’s chainsaw-wielding, questionable hand-gesturing detour into US politics.

FILE PHOTO: Elon Musk holds a chainsaw onstage as he attends the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland, U.S., February 20, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard     TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY/File Photo
Image:
Elon Musk holds a chainsaw onstage at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February. File pic: Reuters

Has his time away from his electric car, space, robotics and AI companies harmed their performance?

And while Starship is an experimental programme, very separate from the successful Falcon launch business, is it a viable design and, even if it is, how much of a drain will its fraught testing programme be on the wider company?

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

SpaceX and Starship are central to NASA’s plans to put Americans back on the moon as soon as 2030. The fact Starship has yet to orbit Earth, let alone land back on it again, means the US space agency must look more seriously to Musk’s competitors like Amazon founder Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin space business to step up.

Musk also wants to use Starship’s heavy-lifting capability to win major defence contracts like Trump’s “golden dome” missile defence shield.

It would be a bold investor who would bet against Musk’s ability to ultimately bend technology to his will.

But even the world’s richest man can’t change time, or the laws of physics, to suit his ambitions.

Content Source: news.sky.com

Related News

Latest News